- a knowledge base for media professionals
ftm News From You
Search / Email Story / Print Page /

News From You

We receive dozens of news tips and press releases each week from ftm contributors. We want MORE. And we want to share the raw information as quickly as possible. NEWS FROM YOU is the forum for adding what you know to what we know. Share what you know...or what your hear. We will apply the light-touch of the editors axe for clarity. We will also accept NEWS FROM YOU in English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Dutch and Portuguese...without translation. (We do insist on being able to understand what you contribute.) You also must clearly indicate that your contribution is for publication in NEWS FROM YOU.

Please note: we cannot use PDF files, only text and .doc files.


Week ending September 29, 2012

IPI/WAN-IFRA - At times like these, media freedom and independence are more important than ever - September 25, 2012
from Larry Kilman/WAN IFRA

In the United States, a movie trailer of uncertain origin is posted on YouTube, purporting to promote “Innocence of Muslims”. Though the trailer is an unbearably stupid, incredibly offensive portrayal of the Prophet Muhammad, with production values of a high-school parody, the trailer sets off a wave of anti-American violence in the Middle East.

Let’s not let the harmful acts of a few overshadow the rest

Though the average American would be offended by the portrayal, and would agree the film does not represent common perceptions about Islam, American embassies across the Middle East and North Africa have become the target of protests and attacks. The spread, scale and intensity of the protests are surprising when one considers how marginal and absurd the film is that purportedly sparked them.

Sustained demonstrations against U.S. embassies have been reported in some 20 countries around the world, and have resulted in several deaths. The most shocking attack occurred on a consulate in Libya, where four Americans, including the ambassador, Christopher Stevens, were killed. (Officials in Libya have since arrested a number of people in connection with what may have been a premeditated attack.)

Western media coverage of the protests has been intense, focussing on violence, anti-American statements and on security measures taken at the embassies. There appears to have been less coverage of protests by people in Muslim countries, who were condemning the attacks.

According to the Libyan Herald, last week there were “growing protests” in Tripoli and Benghazi to condemn the violence that killed Stevens and others. The same is true in Yemen, according to Hakim Almasmari, publisher and chief editor of the Yemen Post. He told us that while “hundreds” had participated in the demonstrations that turned violent in Sana’a last Thursday (an event that reportedly left four protestors dead), many more demonstrated against those attacks the next day. Journalists told IPI that during Friday prayers near the capital’s change square, leaders spoke out against the use of violence. The message they are sending, according to Almasmari, is: “Yes, the film was bad, but the embassy should not have been attacked.”

Many in the Arabic media have reportedly condemned the film, but also the violence, according to media reviews by the BBC and CNN. But, at the same time, there is a widespread belief in the region that such a film could never be made without official sanction, and that the authorities can and should take action to ban such offensive portrayals.

Though much of this belief clearly stems from personal conviction, it also illustrates a misunderstanding about the role of free expression in Western societies, where even offensive speech is protected. This misunderstanding could be corrected by strengthening the news media so that citizens have access to a broader array of ideas and perspectives. There is a universal tendency for people to believe stereotypes, and only a diverse and critical media can help challenge the misunderstandings or even misinformation on which such stereotypes are based.

That's why media freedom and independence are more important than ever. And why new opportunities for building and sustaining independent media around the world must be a priority: so that people who promote hatred and violence can be countered not with more violence, but through discussion and debate in the national and international press.

In Egypt, television journalist Shahira Amin told us: “The media have been low key and calling for those responsible to be held to account. They want the U.S. to take action. I think a lot of people don’t understand free expression, and they’re asking the U.S., thinking the U.S. can do more to crack down on this kind of behaviour.”

She added: “[The media] have also been calling for restraint, and there’s a lot of condemnation about what’s happened in Libya. For the first time, I feel like people are condemning this kind of behaviour and are saying it’s unjustifiable, and I’ve read several columns saying the reaction is a bigger insult to Islam [than the movie].”

Amin explained that it was extremist football fans and Salafists who were primarily responsible for last Tuesday’s attack on the embassy in Cairo. She said that most demonstrators are “venting” their “anger at unmet expectations because of the security lapse, unemployment, high prices.” According to Amin, current demonstrations are just the latest show of anger against the United States that dates back to the era of former president Hosni Mubarak.

The Yemen media, Almasmari said, “are talking about condemning the movie and ensuring people understand the limits of [that condemnation]. It’s a more wise way; they’re saying you have no right to attack these embassies.” He also voiced his hope that “if Muslims are attacked by being called terrorists,” that people in the West would condemn that.

“I think the media should play a neutral role and not take sides. That’s the kind of environment we’d [also] like to see in the West, where people understand what’s right and what’s wrong and condemn the mistakes and not generalize it into a religious issue,” Almasmari said.

As the protests against the U.S. (and more recently against the British and German embassies in Sudan, and with France closing embassies in the wake of the publication of new satirical cartoons) grow, the role of media grows ever more important. Social media provide a way for people around the world to share instant updates and express a broad range of personal views. But only “traditional” news media have the mandate and ability to put the film, the protests and the response to those protests into their political and cultural contexts.

It should be repeatedly underscored that those who made “Innocence of Muslims” represent the feelings of very few. It should also be highlighted that, in the United States, even forms of hate speech are protected under the First Amendment, and there is precious little that the government can do to stop its distribution or punish its creators, as revolting as this little production may be.

Western media can also better explain the reaction in the Arab world by distinguishing between who is calling for demonstrations, and who is hoping for (or involved in) violent attacks and looting. There is more to these protests than an extreme reaction to an amateurish film made by a bunch of marginal, professional haters. There are long-held resentments towards the United States that are resurfacing (and can be exploited by the self-serving) and there are vastly different understandings of what kinds of speech should be restricted. For example, the New York Times reported on Sunday that the book The Da Vinci Code was banned by several Middle Eastern countries because it was considered an affront to Christianity and that, for example, Egypt forbids “insulting any of the three Abrahamic religions.” The reporter also notes that in Egypt, there is a “widespread belief” that Holocaust denial is illegal in the United States, which it is not.

This is the type of thing American audiences should know in order to better understand the protests in Egypt, and it demonstrates the kind of misinformation that the media should seek to address.

It’s a complicated world. At times like these, it is more important than ever that the media be free to report on the truth, and that they exercise the judgment to do so in a calm and clear-eyed way. Let us not let the harmful acts of a few – the hateful film, the vicious attacks – overwhelm the ability of people to be properly informed by the only institutions with a clear mandate to do so: the independent news media.

- This editorial is a joint statement from the Vienna-based International Press Institute (IPI) and the Paris and Darmstadt-based World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (WAN-IFRA).

VPRT - Private Fernsehsender treten der Initiative bei und stellen ab sofort Sendezeit zur Verfügung - September 24 2012
from Gesa Klebe/VPRT

Zahlreiche Fernsehprogramme und Video-on-Demand-Portale des privaten Rundfunks beginnen ab sofort mit der Ausstrahlung und Verbreitung des Social-TV-Spots der Initiative „sicher online gehen – Kinderschutz im Internet“. Damit erhält die im Juli dieses Jahres von Bund, Ländern und der Wirtschaft gestartete Initiative weiter Rückenwind. Der Spot soll in den nächsten Wochen vor allem Eltern und Erziehende auf das Portal „“ aufmerksam machen. Das Portal zeigt Möglichkeiten, Kindern einen sicheren Surfraum einzurichten – mit einer Kombination aus kindgerechten Online-Angeboten, sicheren Einstellungen und Jugendschutzprogrammen. Durch die Anerkennung von zwei Jugendschutzprogrammen durch die Kommission für Jugendmedienschutz (KJM) erhalten Wirkungsweise und Weiterentwicklung dieser Programme besondere Aufmerksamkeit.

„Den Weg in einen sicheren Surfraum für Kinder können wir nur gemeinsam mit den Eltern gehen“, sagte die Bundesministerin für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend, Kristina Schröder. „Deshalb ist es wichtig, dass alle Eltern die Möglichkeiten kennen, mit denen sie ihre Kinder bei den ersten Schritten im Netz begleiten können. Alle Partner der Initiative stehen gemeinsam dafür ein, möglichst viele Familien zu informieren. Unser TV-Spot und die Sendezeit, die die neuen Partner aus dem privaten Rundfunk zur Verfügung stellen, sind dazu ein ganz entscheidender Beitrag.“

„Wir freuen uns darüber, dass sich auch der Private Rundfunk so aktiv an unserem gemeinsamen Ziel des Jugendmedienschutzes beteiligt“, kommentierten die Ministerpräsidenten Beck und Tillich für die Rundfunkkommission der Länder. „Es ist wichtig, dass auch die Wirtschaft ihrer Verantwortung für den Jugendschutz in unserer medialen Gesellschaft gerecht wird.“

Jürgen Doetz, Präsident des Verbandes Privater Rundfunk und Telemedien (VPRT) erklärte: „Der VPRT und die betroffenen Mitglieder haben sich über die letzten Jahre kontinuierlich in den Ausbau des Jugendmedienschutzes eingebracht. Nunmehr gilt es, vor allem Eltern und Erziehungsberechtigte über die neuen Schutzmöglichkeiten, insbesondere die von der Kommission für Jugendmedienschutz anerkannten Jugendschutzprogramme, zu informieren und zum aktiven Handeln zu animieren. Dass die betroffenen privaten Fernsehsender umfangreiche Medialeistungen für die Ausstrahlung des ‚sicher online gehen‘-TV-Spots bereitstellen, ist ein weiterer Beleg für das aktive Jugendschutzengagement des privaten Rundfunks.“

Der Verband Privater Rundfunk und Telemedien (VPRT) gehört zu den Erstunterzeichnern der Charta „sicher online gehen – Kinderschutz im Internet“. Mit Unterzeichnung der Charta haben sich im Juli 2012 über 30 Partner aus Bund, Ländern, der Wirtschaft sowie des Kinder- und Jugendschutzes zum aktiven Kinderschutz im Internet verpflichtet. Ihre Beiträge reichen vom Engagement beim Aufbau eines vielfältigen Netzes für Kinder, über Elterninformation bis hin zur Weiterentwicklung und Verbreitung von Jugendschutzprogrammen. Mit Beginn der TV-Spot-Ausstrahlung unterzeichnen eine Reihe privater Rundfunk- und Telemedienanbieter die Charta und schließen sich der Initiative an.

Eine Übersicht über die Fernsehprogramme und Video-on-Demand-Portale, welche den TV-Spot verbreiten werden, finden Sie unter

Previous News From You

News From You: Week ending September 8, 2012

News From You: Week ending August 25, 2012

News From You: Week ending July 28, 2012

News From You: Week ending July 21, 2012

News From You: Week ending July 7, 2012

News From You: Week ending June 23, 2012

News From You: Week ending June 2, 2012

News From You: Week ending May 26, 2012

News From You: Week ending May 12, 2012

News From You: Week ending May 5, 2012

News From You: Week ending April 28, 2012

News From You: Week ending April 20, 2012

News From You: Week ending April 14, 2012

News From You: Week ending April 7, 2012

News From You: Week ending March 31, 2012

News From You: Week ending March 17, 2012

News From You: Week ending March 10, 2012

News From You: Week ending February 25, 2012

News From You: Week ending February 18, 2012

News From You: Week ending February 11, 2012

News From You: Week ending January 21, 2012

News From You: Week ending January 14, 2012

News From You: Week ending January 7, 2012

copyright ©2004-2012 ftm partners, unless otherwise noted Contact UsSponsor ftm