followthemedia.com - a knowledge base for media professionals
Fit To Print
AGENDA

All Things Digital
This digital environment

Big Business
Media companies and their world

Brands
Brands and branding, modern and post

The Commonweal
Media associations and institutes

Conflict Zones
Media making a difference

Fit To Print
The Printed Word and the Publishing World

Insight
Bright thoughts, Big ideas

Lingua Franca
Culture and language

Media Rules and Rulers
Media politics

The Numbers
Watching, listening and reading

The Public Service
Public Service Broadcasting

Show Business
Entertainment and entertainers

Sports and Media
Rights, cameras and action

Spots and Space
The Advertising Business

Write On
Journalism with a big J

Send ftm Your News!!
news@followthemedia.com

“Platform Neutrality” No Longer Means Writing for the Newspaper and Adapting for the Web.
The New York Times Has Decreed An End To Newspaper and Web Journalist Distinctions And Their Newsrooms Shall Become One, Working for Both.

The New York Times web site has more unique daily visitors than the print newspaper has circulation. But the newspaper’s advertising revenues dwarfs those of the web site. But the web site’s advertising revenues are growing at double digit annual percentages whereas the newspaper sees such growth in the low single digits. So which is the more important?

In a stunning note to its web and newspaper newsrooms the Times has made clear it believes each platform is as important as the other, and therefore each will henceforth be treated equally for the Times to spread its news.

ftm background

Can A Newspaper or Broadcaster’s Web Site Become Too Popular?
From initially hoping that web news sites would just go away, to then adopting the “if you can’t beat them join them but with as little as possible” strategy to then jumping in with no holds barred, the media has grappled since the Internet began to define its rightful place on the web.

New York Times Tries Something New: If the Young Won’t Read Its Newspaper, Then Buy Into the One They Do
The old adage goes, “If you can’t beat them, join them,” and that is exactly what the New York Times Company has done in Boston in a novel experiment to see if it cannot yet still hook the youth market.

Did You Notice That All Those Big Newspaper Deals This Year to Buy Internet Sites Were for Cash, Not Shares?
Could the average 15% drop In newspaper 2005 share prices have something to do with that?

Who Do You Think Is Raking In the Money?
Google Is now worth some $US60 billion, Yahoo around $US50 billion. Compare with Dow Jones at about $US3 billion or Tribune, with all their big city newspapers and TV stations, at around $US15 billion

NYT Baits Bloggers
By September access to opinion columnists on the New York Times web-site will come with a charge. This newspaper has decided that there’s money in weblogs.

And it makes clear there is no stopping the digital revolution. The Times has, for instance, various video capabilities it can put to good use on its web platform, and the public have taken up broadband delivery to the point that video is now appealing.

“Our readers are moving on, and so are we,” said a memo signed by Bill Keller, Times executive editor, and Martin Nisenholtz, senior vice president for digital operations.

The Times currently makes all of its production available for its web site, but that means the web is really just a different platform to display the print information. Under the new policy the web gets involved in the early story planning stages and as those stories are worked on the needs for the web are uppermost in thought – different pictures, perhaps different stories, video, and all the rest.

It is yet another transformation for the newspaper website, already profitable and which management believes could be the cash cow for the future. Starting September 19 it will charge $49.95 for a new product, TimesSelect that provides paid -only access to the so-called op-ed writers – eight star Times writers -- plus regular columns written by 14 other staff news columnists. Other benefits include access to the archives which now costs $2.95 an item and earns around $1 million a year. A print edition subscriber gets TimesSelect at no additional charge.

Currently the print and web newsrooms are in different buildings and they won’t fully physically integrate into one newsroom until the Times moves into a new 52-story Times Square headquarters in 2007. But some steps are being taken now.

“We are looking at ways to promote much more side-by-side cooperation in conceiving and executing journalism,” the memo said. “Web producers should routinely participate in the daily conversations where coverage is launched. Senior editors of the Web should be a presence at all of the meetings where …others hatch plans.  In the (newspaper) newsroom everyone should come to regard the website as his or her responsibility.”

Under the plan the newspaper managing editor for news becomes also managing editor of news for the web site; the newspaper foreign report editor becomes the foreign report for the web site. It’s convergence in the truest sense.

The message is very clear. The online component of the Times’ multi-platform information system has been publicly upgraded to being as important as the mother print ship itself. The newspaper is said to have more than 1100 editorial staff whereas the web site has about 40, so in practical terms the message was really to tell print how strategic the company sees its nytimes web operation and as journalists they need to adapt to that thinking, too.

Barry Lipton, president of the Newspaper Guild of New York, said the union had no philosophical problem with the combining of newsrooms, but since each now works under separate contracts (the 40 web staff are said to earn less than their newspaper compatriots) then negotiations will be necessary to cover pay differentials.

Many newspaper analysts said they thought this was a move whose time had come. But the number of US newspapers that have actually combined their print and web sites are few and far between. Two of the largest and most successful competitors to the Times, TheWashington Post and The Wall Street Journal both maintain separate print-web staffs and neither have indicated they plan to merge them.

Many newspapers have recognized the importance and popularity of their web sites, but since print produces so much more advertising revenue than the web site, there has always been a reluctance to see each as equals. Indeed some newspapers in the past 12 months have started to take items off their web sites so they are available only within the print edition in an effort to regain readers who may have left print entirely for the web site.

On the journalistic side, platform neutrality still meant producing for the newspaper and then adapting that work for the web.

The Times has now made clear that with its web site already seeing more readers than the print edition and with advertising revenues growing at rates much faster than for print, that now is the time to ensure that the web can be the very finest editorial product possible, embracing all that the digital revolution permits to tell a story, encouraging its editorial staff when planning and providing coverage to think digital as it thinks print..

It’s a philosophy other newspapers should closely follow.



ftm Follow Up & Comments

copyright ©2005 ftm publishing, unless otherwise noted Contact UsSponsor ftm